Evaluating key characteristics of ideal colorectal cancer screening modalities: the microsimulation approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background and AimsScreening for colorectal cancer (CRC) can effectively reduce CRC incidence mortality. Besides colonoscopy, tests the detection of biomarkers in stool, blood, or serum, including fecal immunochemical test (FIT), ColoGuard, Epi proColon, PolypDx, have recently been advanced. We aimed to identify characteristics theoretic, highly efficient screening calculated effectiveness cost available tests.MethodsUsing microsimulation-based colon modeling open-source tool (CMOST), we simulated 142,501 theoretic with variable assumptions adenoma carcinoma sensitivity, specificity, frequency, adherence, identified outperforming colonoscopy. For tests, 10 replicates a virtual population 2 million individuals, using epidemiologic costs United States.ResultsHighly were characterized by high sensitivity advanced patient adherence. All effective at 100% adherence expected real-world rates. below threshold 100,000 U.S. dollars per life year gained. With perfect FIT was most cost-efficient intervention, whereas proColon In our analysis, had strongest impact on screening.ConclusionsOur microsimulation study confirmed cost-effectiveness colonoscopy urine-, blood-, stool-based tests. Better results superior prevention whole population. Screening Using States. Highly screening. Our
منابع مشابه
Evaluating Colorectal Cancer Screening Options
Colorectal cancer (crc) is the 2nd most common cancer and cancer cause of death in Canada1 and the 4th most common cancer worldwide2. Screening has been shown to be effective in reducing the incidence of and mortality from the disease3–8. However, several alternative methods for crc screening are available, not all of which have been evaluated by randomized clinical trials. All crc screening me...
متن کاملEvaluating lung cancer screening in China: Implications for eligibility criteria design from a microsimulation modeling approach
More than half of males in China are current smokers and evidence from western countries tells us that an unprecedented number of smoking-attributable deaths will occur as the Chinese population ages. We used the China Lung Cancer Policy Model (LCPM) to simulate effects of computed tomography (CT)-based lung cancer screening in China, comparing the impact of a screening guideline published in 2...
متن کاملCMOST: an open-source framework for the microsimulation of colorectal cancer screening strategies
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. CRC incidence and mortality can be reduced by several screening strategies, including colonoscopy, but randomized CRC prevention trials face significant obstacles such as the need for large study populations with long follow-up. Therefore, CRC screening strategies will likely be designed and optimized based on co...
متن کاملEvaluating the efficacy of various therapeutic modalities in advanced esophageal cancer
Introduction: Esophageal cancer is an invasive and fatal malignancy, with the highest global incidence in southern and eastern Africa and eastern Asia. Patients with advanced localized disease and poor prognosis face a five-year survival rate of 15% to 34%. The research is aimed at evaluating Different strategies have been done to treat esophageal cancer by meta-analysis. <str...
متن کاملA Practical Approach for Colorectal Cancer Screening
This work was supported by grants from the American Gastroenterological Association Research Scholar Award (JKL), and from the National Cancer Institute (U54 CA163262) Colorectal cancer remains a public health burden in the United States. Although randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, a large proportion of Americans rema...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1085-8741', '0016-5107', '1097-6779']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.02.013